On 17/04/17 02:21 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: > On 04/17/2017 01:12 PM, Ian wrote: >> >> No, I don't understand how it's relevant to the specific topic of avoiding >> split-brains, either. > >>> Take a simple example of shared-nothing read-only cluster: all you need >>> to know is that the daemon is bound to '*' and the floating ip is bound >>> to eth0. > > In shred-nothing cluster "split brain" means whichever MAC address is in > ARP cache of the border router is the one that gets the traffic. How > does the existing code figure this one out?
That sounds like a use-case where a full HA cluster is overkill already. In any case, it would be a tiny fraction of installs and would be tangential to the 2v3+ node debate that this thread started with. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.com/w/ "I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops." - Stephen Jay Gould _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
