On Tue, 2018-04-03 at 16:24 +0000, Sam Gardner wrote: > "In short, I'd recommend separate constraints :) e.g. start rscA then > promote rscB, promote rscB then start rscC." > > I've fiddled around with my code and gotten it to do this. > > Just out of curiosity, is there an upper limit on the number of > individual constraints that we can put in place?
Nope > 10 or 15 resources colocated on the same node, starting up in a > consistent order will require (at least) 2x the number of constraints > in this scheme - it seemed to me that sets would simplify things but > perhaps not. Groups are easier to follow if you have simple colocation+order sequences. Sets can help with more complicated set-ups, but they are tricky to get right and always difficult to read. -- Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
