On 20/02/19 21:16 +0100, Klaus Wenninger wrote: > On 02/20/2019 08:51 PM, Jan Pokorný wrote: >> On 20/02/19 17:37 +0000, Edwin Török wrote: >>> strace for the situation described below (corosync 95%, 1 vCPU): >>> https://clbin.com/hZL5z >> I might have missed that earlier or this may be just some sort >> of insignificant/misleading clue: >> >>> strace: Process 4923 attached with 2 threads >>> strace: [ Process PID=4923 runs in x32 mode. ] > > A lot of reports can be found that strace seems to get this wrong > somehow.
Haven't ever seen that (incl. today's attempts), but could be: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/7/823 It's no fun when debugging tools generate more questions than they are meant to answer. >> but do you indeed compile corosync using x32 ABI? (moreover >> while pristine x86_64 libqb is used, i.e., using 64bit pointers?) >> >> Perhaps would be good to state any such major divergencies if >> so unless I missed that. -- Jan (Poki)
pgpHXWMJsanRa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
