Hi Christine,

Thank for your explanation.
Originally, there is concurrent fence feature in Pacemaker, you clear my doubt 
:-) 

Thanks
Gang

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Users [mailto:users-boun...@clusterlabs.org] On Behalf Of christine
> caulfield
> Sent: 2019年10月23日 15:09
> To: users@clusterlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] DLM in the cluster can tolerate more than one node
> failure at the same time?
> 
> On 22/10/2019 07:15, Gang He wrote:
> > Hi List,
> >
> > I remember that master node has the full copy for one DLM lock
> > resource and the other nodes have their own lock status, then if one node is
> failed(or fenced), the DLM lock status can be recovered from the remained
> node quickly.
> > My question is,
> > if there are more than one node which are failed at the same time, the DLM
> lock service for the remained nodes in the cluster can still continue to work
> after recovery?
> >
> >
> 
> Yes. The local DLM keeps a copy of its own locks and the remaining DLM
> nodes will collaborate to re-master all of the locks that they know about.  
> The
> number of nodes that leave at one time has no impact on this.
> 
> Chrissie
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Manage your subscription:
> https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
_______________________________________________
Manage your subscription:
https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users

ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/

Reply via email to