Hello Strahil, This kind of configuration should not be recommended. Why? Since SBD partition need to be accessed by the cluster nodes stably/frequently. But the other partition (for XFS file system) is probably under extreme pressure conditions, in that case, the SBD partition IO requests will starve to timeout.
Thanks Gang ________________________________________ From: Users <users-boun...@clusterlabs.org> on behalf of Strahil Nikolov <hunter86...@yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2020 5:15 AM To: users@clusterlabs.org Subject: [ClusterLabs] SBD on shared disk Hello Community, I'm preparing for my EX436 and I was wondering if there are any drawbacks if a shared LUN is split into 2 partitions and the first partition is used for SBD , while the second one for Shared File System (Either XFS for active/passive, or GFS2 for active/active). Do you see any drawback in such implementation ? Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
