Hello, On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 09:27:16 +0000 lejeczek via Users <users@clusterlabs.org> wrote:
> ... > Perhaps as the author(s) you can chip in and/or help via comments to > rectify this: > > ... > > Problem: package resource-agents-paf-4.9.0-7.el8.x86_64 requires PAF doesn't share the same release plans than the resource-agents project, but it seems RH included it in their build process as part as the resource-agents one, releasing it with the same version number: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872754 RH is delivering PAF since the RHSA-2021:4139 security fixes and update, in november 2021: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:4139 I wasn't aware of this packaging and how it is built, neither of the repository it is delivered to. I am only aware of the RPM I am delivering on github, and the one provided by the PGDG repository: https://yum.postgresql.org/packages/ > ... > How I understand that is that CentOS guys/community have PAF in > 'resilientstorage' repo. I have no idea why the PAF package is in this repo and not in the HighAvailability one where I suppose it should be host. Compare: * http://mirror.centos.org/centos/8-stream/HighAvailability/x86_64/os/Packages/ * http://mirror.centos.org/centos/8-stream/ResilientStorage/x86_64/os/Packages/ Ping Oyvind, maybe you have some input about this as the resource-agents package maintainer? Regards, _______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/