thank you. i will try fluent-bit for now.
Raphael Mazelier wrote:
maybe you can you try another log shipper to validate this assumption; there are plenty and fluentd is already an old (and buggy and slow one); you can try fluent-bit or vector maybe.
thank you. i will try fluent-bit for now.
Raphael Mazelier wrote:
maybe you can you try another log shipper to validate this assumption; there are plenty and fluentd is already an old (and buggy and slow one); you can try fluent-bit or vector maybe.