on meta-data? Yes indeed. Regards,
Alex On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Kenny <ken.bell...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Alex, > > If a custom field is included send_sms, would the value be moved to > sent_sms ? > > -- > Regards > Kenny > > > > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri < > alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> You should add an arbitrary id to your dlr-url, that's the usual way to do >> it. >> >> Hope it helps. >> >> Alex >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:43 AM, James E <jam...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Thanks for your replies. >>> >>> Is there a way when inserting into the Send_sms table, to match it to the >>> DLR in the sent_sms? >>> >>> At the moment, I see no linking between the MT and DLR in the sent_sms >>> table. >>> >>> Regards, >>> J >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri < >>> alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> James, >>>> >>>> No, it doesn't work like that. The DLR message actually comes from the >>>> carrier, so it'll insert only the information from that message. You'll get >>>> your BINFO on the sent_sms copy of the message you've sent, but not on the >>>> DLR's coming from the carrier. You could, however, pass the value you're >>>> storing on the BINFO as a parameter on the dlr-url, and that way you'll be >>>> able to get it when kannel hits the dlr-url. >>>> >>>> Hope it helps, >>>> >>>> Alex >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:10 AM, James E <jam...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I am just wondering, if I enter BINFO into the send_sms table, shouldnt >>>>> it be carried and inserted into the sent_sms table as well in the DLR >>>>> info? >>>>> >>>>> In my attempts it isnt doing this. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> J >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
