Dave Close wrote: > Tim wrote: >> Adam Mercer wrote: >>> I've been using some of the earlier 115.x builds that showed up >>> for F38 witout issue. This morning I built 115.2.2, from the F39 >>> source RPM using mock, and so far it's been running without issue... >> >>Well, I might disagree. Your message was extremely scrambled by the >>GPG/PGP process. >> >>What I see is mostly unhandled MIME coming through raw. Headers in the >>message body, mangled body content, undecoded signature MIME content, >>then two PGP attachments, etc. > > The problem could be your Evolution. Adam's message seemed just fine > when I saw it using exmh.
The problem is that the message uses inline PGP¹ and it does
not escape the leading ------- characters which are part of
the 'Original Message' delimiter.
Mutt reports the following from gpg when trying to process
the message signature:
gpg: unexpected armor: ------- Original Message -------\n
gpg: invalid armor header: On Sunday, September 24th, 2023 at 06:36, stan
via users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:\n
Mutt does display the message properly then.
There is also an attached public key and then that has a
detached signature as well, which seems odd and not likely
to be useful. I have no idea why Proton Mail would do that,
if it is the mail agent responsible for it.
¹ Technically, the sentence could end there and it would
still be reasonably accurate. ;)
--
Todd
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
