Yes, that is what should be. But in my case JSF Mojarra + Tomahawk causes a lot of problems, eg :
1. First (but it doesn't matter): 2008-04-21 13:22:02 org.apache.commons.digester.Digester error SEVERE: Parse Error at line 5 column 14: Document root element "faces-config", must match DOCTYPE root "null". org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Document root element "faces-config", must match DOCTYPE root "null". when faces-config.xml is successfully validated and in 100% is good. 2. My real problem is this exception: 2008-04-21 13:29:52 org.apache.myfaces.webapp.filter.ExtensionsFilter doFilter SEVERE: Exception wile retrieving addResource javax.servlet.ServletException: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class org.apache.myfaces.shared_tomahawk.config.MyfacesConfig (but the same project + MyFaces + Tomahawk works perfect). This exception takes place when I try to add `Tomahawk-1.6.jar` to my projet with jsf-api.jar and jsf-impl.jar from SUN JSF. I need Tomahawk for e.g files upload. Regards 2008/4/21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > This isn't correct; Tomahawk can be used with any JSF implementation, eg > Sun's. > > In very old Tomahawk versions, you needed to add a "shared" jar if you > weren't using myfaces but that was removed long ago. > > Regards, > Simon > > Grzesiek schrieb: > > > Personally I regret tomahawk can't be used without myfaces > > (dependencies on `_shared` jars). > >
