For Wicket the doctype is not needed, so do what you like. Just remember
to keep it in XML syntax. There is only one ceavat: you should always
write <div wicket:id="..."></div> instead of <div wicket:id="..."/>,
Wicket ignores the XML definition that specifies that these should be
treated as semantically equivalent.
Regards,
Erik.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
> As a Wicket beginner, I was wondering if there are any contra-indication
> to generate some HTML 4.01 Strict instead of any XHTML 1.0 version
> (transitionnal or strict) ?
> I tried to simply add an HTML 4.01 strict doctype to my html files, and it
> seems to work fine (thought in development mode I have in the source the
> xmlns:wicket in the body tag and all of the Wicket XHTML tags - going to
> deployement mode an they disappear)
> Is there anything I must take care of ? Wicket use a namespace server-side
> so... ?
> Best regards,
> P. Goiffon
>
--
Erik van Oosten
http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
