There really is no good reason to use http session store instead of secondlevelcachesessionstore unless you are experiencing performance problems. HttpSessionStore uses more memory and keeps much shorter history so your users will be experiencing page expiration much more often.
-Matej On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Eyal Golan <egola...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I read this post > http://ptrthomas.wordpress.com/2009/09/14/perfbench-update-tapestry-5-and-grails/ > and he suggested to use HttpSessionStore instead of the second cache... > > I looked into the javadoc and the code itself and understood the > differences. > > However, can anyone explain in a bit more detail the implications / > differences of using the Http instead of the SecondLayer? > The reason I'm asking this, is because, if it's better use, then I want to > convince my team that we change the implementation of our application to use > Http store. > > > Thanks very much. > > Eyal Golan > egola...@gmail.com > > Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/ > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/egolan74 > > P Save a tree. Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
