On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Ben Tilford <bentilf...@gmail.com> wrote: > Whats better is going to come down to what your comfortable with, willing > to learn, and if squeezing a couple milliseconds of performance matters or > not.
That's one of the key points I think folks need to think about when it comes to considering Groovy for something like this. It has had a bad reputation for being slow (so did Java back in the day). Scala is pretty fast from what I understand. Although Scala, as you pointed out, has a higher learning curve. It does seem to be a more "cerebral" programming language. When I read the Scala book, I was left scratching my head on some of the topics. I've been studying new programming languages a lot lately and Scala is definitely one of the ones I like, but I can see where it would be difficult to grasp for the less-experienced folks. Some of the others seem a bit more intuitive. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
