Hello, I already sent an improved previously sent patch for closing 2 very small but annoying bugs at redhat-cluster opened for too much time. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=400204 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=417813 already successfully compiled and installed the packages rebuilt. will have to test them, as dpkg could not configure them. Already adapted ubuntu system-config-cluster and rebuilt on etch http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=424674 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=410749 tomorrow I will try to carefully test these packages. Then, modify changelog to debian policy naming standard.
Interaction ubuntu <-> debian: At these specific packages, ubuntu maintainer seems to have a lead start from 2004. How avoid efforts duplication? What are the differences from redhat-cluster from ubuntu to debian really needed, justifying a different packaging? (this answer could save a lenghty analysis of the two sources). I will try to help with packaging porting efforts and debugging at these packages. I will have to use them. I made rpm packages for years before, have to use RH at work also, and from some months have been improving my deb packaging knowledge. http://wiki.debian.org/PkgSplit The redhat-cluster maintainer could be a natural sponsor for these nmu. How much time should I wait for an answer before asking for other dd for a nmu sponsoring? I know a few other DDs at my country that could help (also, could be straightfoward for a future nm process) at these nmu after some reasonable timeout. Regards. Andre Felipe Machado http://www.techforce.com.br _______________________________________________ Utnubu-discuss mailing list Utnubu-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/utnubu-discuss