Petr Baudis wrote: >> That's a totally different approach. A process manager would say, >> we're adding a new role: a QM-developer. (the one who's responsible >> for making QM'ed releases out of the often messed up upstream). > > Ok, but then you need to acknowledge that the properties I mentioned are > something you are not interested in.
Right. Just let's go back to which problem we originally want to solve: a) cleanup/fix upstream's mess to produce production-grade releases. b) create automatically installable (distro-)packages from releases. See my last mail (response to Manoj): part a) are the QM-branches, and b) the distro branches (for several distros, eg. Gentoo, probably not needed at all). cu -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ cellphone: +49 174 7066481 email: i...@metux.de skype: nekrad666 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ vcs-pkg-discuss mailing list vcs-pkg-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/vcs-pkg-discuss