holy shit.
I'm...stunned.

As an aside, in the era of video cameras on cell phones, isn't seizing video
pretty futile? I mean, even in this situation, the seizing was captured on
video.

-halcyon
pinkbroadcasting.com

On 12/12/06, ~ FluxRostrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>   The War on Journalism
>
> http://fluxrostrum.blogspot.com/2006/11/war-on-journalism.html
>
> description from I-Witness Video
> http://iwitnessvideo.info
>
> On October 30, 2006 at a demonstration protesting the murder of journalist
> Brad Will in Mexico, members of the NYPD assaulted an independent
> videographer and stole his videocamera.
>
> That's right, stole. The filmmaker, FluxRostrum, was not arrested. He did
> not receive a receipt for seized property. He was not even directly asked
> for his camera. Instead, without any warning, he was jumped by two police
> officers, one of whom is an NYPD captain, and knocked down onto the asphalt
> of 39th Street. One police officer was succcesful in wrenching the camera
> out of Flux's hands. As Flux crawled around on the ground looking for the
> eyeglasses which had been knocked off his face during the attack, the cop
> with the camera quickly conferred with another officer. Then he ran off to
> hide the camera.
>
> When Flux attempted to get his camera back after the demonstration, he was
> threatened with arrest by a Lieutenant at the 17th Precinct. His lawyer was
> told that camera was found "abandoned" at the scene and that it had been
> turned over to the Manhattan District Attorney's office to be used as
> evidence against people arrested at the Mexican Consulate demonstration that
> day.
>
> Someone at the 17th Precinct told the D.A. that the camera was found
> "abandoned" on the sidewalk. Now the D.A. is insisting on keeping a copy
> of the stolen videotape to use as evidence.
>
> Is this the new normal? Is it legal just because the police say so?
>
> If police do not have their own videocameras at events will they simply
> bonk one of us over the head and steal our gear and videotapes? What if they
> decide that they do not like what the videotape shows? Will they then
> destroy it as has happened to so many cameras seized by the NYPD over the
> past couple of years?
>
> This story is a little hard to believe, isn't it? Fortunately, you do not
> have to take my word for it. Not to be denied his voice, Flux made a
> videotape about his experience at the hands of NYPD.
>
> This is the first blog installment in an ongoing I-Witness Video
> investigation, The War on Cameras.
>
> POSTED BY
> Eileen Clancy
>
> Solidarity,
> ~FluxRostrum
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> VLOG~FLUX
> http://FluxRostrum.BlogSpot.com
> ~~~
> Syndicate Flux
> http://feeds.feedburner.com/VLOGFLUX
> ~~~
> Old School
> http://Fluxview.com
> ~~~
> NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency
> may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do
> this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse nor
> protection save to call for the impeachment of the current President.
> ~~~
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Get your free email from http://www.graffiti.net
>
> Powered By Outblaze
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to