I agree. This isn't impressing me in the least about either party.

 

I don't really care anymore. You both are polluting this group and it needs
to stop, and stop now.

 

Take it onto your blogs where, if we care, we can read your slings at each
other.

 

Robert

 

 

 

 

  _____  

From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Digital Buddha
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 10:49 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: OOoh, Amanda's Up!

 

Andrew and Amada, I admire your work both when you were working together,
and now independently of one another. I am embarrassed for the two of you
with your public display. The court of public opinion is not the one to
discuss this. It may not seem like poor judgement today to either of you,
but you may be thinking much differently a year or two from now.

Please, please, please take it off line. You are now at the stage of
"virtual shouting". I am waiting for objects to start to fly. It will just
get uglier. I hope you and your respective legal counsel will be able to
settle this swiftly.

On 12/16/06, Amanda Congdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:amanda%40amandacongdon.com> n.com> wrote:
>
> This proves what? That I (not you) had an HBO meeting and that I fired
> my manager?
>
> --- In videoblogging@ <mailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com <videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>,
> andrew michael baron
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > As you can see, I spent legal fees on the HBO opportunity that was
> > meant for Rocketboom but yea, as I said, you stole it away for yourself.
> >
> > Lie #2. Resolved.
> >
> > Begin forwarded message:
> > > From: "Amanda Congdon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: June 2, 2006 2:20:46 PM EDT
> > > To: "Thompson, Bryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Cc: "Johnson, Channing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "andrew michael
> > > baron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jim Congdon"
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: Re: Matthew Lesher, semi-urgent
> > >
> > > Bryan and Channing,
> > >
> > > Thank you for getting back to me on this so quickly. As it turns
> > > out, the HBO meeting is now happening on Monday rather than later
> > > today. The introductory meeting between Ari, Andrew and me is still
> > > on as scheduled at 3pm Pacific. How does this change the order of
> > > events, if at all?
> > >
> > > Yes, please prepare Matthew's termination letter.
> > >
> > > Thanks again,
> > >
> > > Amanda
> > >
> > > On 6/2/06, Thompson, Bryan < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Amanda:
> > >
> > > I spoke to Channing about this. We think that your analysis of the
> > > situation is spot-on accurate and that it would be appropriate for
> > > you now to terminate your relationship with Matthew.
> > >
> > > Accordingly, we believe that you should inform Matthew, both orally
> > > and in writing, that your relationship with him is now terminated.
> > > You should also inform him that he is not to participate in the HBO
> > > conference call, nor is he to contact or speak with HBO or Endeavor
> > > concerning you, Andrew, or Rocketboom.
> > >
> > > Let me know if you would like us to prepare a letter to Matthew
> > > concerning this.
> > >
> > > In order to assure that Matthew is not on the call, you will need
> > > to contact him orally before the call. Even if we sent a letter
> > > right now, he might not actually read it before the HBO call
> > > begins. When you speak to him you can let him know that a letter
> > > will be coming.
> > >
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>
> > > Behalf Of Amanda Congdon
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 10:19 PM
> > > To: Johnson, Channing; Thompson, Bryan; andrew michael baron
> > > Cc: Jim Congdon
> > > Subject: Matthew Lesher, semi-urgent
> > >
> > > Hello everyone,
> > >
> > > I spoke with Matthew Lesher this evening. I asked him why Ari
> > > Emanuel would be under the impression he was Rocketboom's manger.
> > > He said he didn't know, that maybe Ari just "assumed" as much. He
> > > then said, in fact, that both he and Ari had no interest in the
> > > management of Rocketboom. He also said that because Ari (and thus
> > > Endeavor) were not involved in the book deal, that he felt Ari was
> > > being "aggressive" in wanting 10% equity in Rocketboom. I asked him
> > > why he then jumped on the bandwagon and asked for the same thing
> > > (on Friday Matthew brought up getting 10% too). He started back
> > > peddling and saying that we were just beginning the conversation,
> > > that nothing had been decided. I told him it sounded like he didn't
> > > have my best interests in mind, and he said no, he was just
> > > presenting all the options. If he truly had my best interest in
> > > mind, he would have told me he thought Ari was being aggressive on
> > > Friday, not now after I pressed him about it. Bottom line is that I
> > > don't trust him, so I believe the relationship will have to be
> > > terminated. I would love to hear what everyone else thinks.
> > >
> > > The big issue now is that I have a conference call today (Friday)
> > > scheduled with Caroline Strauss at HBO to workshop show ideas at
> > > 2:30 Pacific, and I don't want Matthew in on that. Ari is the only
> > > one that had anything to do with setting that up. Matthew also has
> > > included himself in an introductory conversation that was supposed
> > > to happen directly before the HBO meeting, with Andrew, Ari and
> > > me. Andrew just sent me an email suggesting perhaps the talk with
> > > Matthew occur very shortly before the HBO meeting is scheduled, so
> > > as not to give Matthew time to backlash before the meeting. Help
> > > please!!
> > >
> > > Thanks so much for all of your guidance,
> > >
> > > Amanda
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
> 
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to