Yes. No sport at all. Take any show with any topic and put attractive women/girls in it, and you'll have guys that watch the show just to see the girls. :) NO interest whatsoever in what the topic is or what she said. They could probably tell you more about what she was (or wasn't) wearing than what the episode was about. :D
Still, assuming you're correct that women aren't taking advantage of this, they really should be. Porno chicks have relatively short-lived careers because they can't maintain their body-types for more than a few years. They should be able to parlay their industry experience into production or managerial positions instead of hitting the has-been strip club circuit. It's a very interesting (and hard) question... I think it deserves investigation. -- Bill C. http://ReelSolid.TV --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Jan McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And as Raymond says, do not let us forget [to ask] the [hard] questions. > > This is a difficult one for sure. > > It is stooping to use boobs; shooting fish in a barrel. Not much sport in > it. That's my biggest problem with it. > > Why calculate the lowest common denominator when the high denominator is so > much more fun? > > Jan > > On 3/25/07, Bill Cammack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Jan McLaughlin" > > <jannie.jan@> wrote: > > > > > > Don't f'in' get me started. > > > > > > Aw crap. Here it comes... > > > > > > The lesson: women must take better / more directed advantage of > > silly men. > > > They are totally at our mercy. > > > > > > What is it we women really want? > > > > > > Why don't more women create these shows and make $ off 'em? I know > > there's a > > > reason. Can it be a good reason? > > > > > > Jan > > > > I hadn't given any thought to the statistics behind whether it's men > > or women that exploit the advantage over silly men of "sex sells", but > > I'd have to guess that you're right and that there aren't enough women > > "behind the camera" as it were in these situations. Women are being > > 'used' to drive interest in shows or websites, but other than being > > hired as "on-air talent", they're probably not too involved in the > > process. > > > > I wonder how tough it would be for a group of women to get together > > and create a production company or whatever to 'exploit' their own > > (meaning women in general, not THE women of the production company. > > :D) aesthetic advantages. > > > > A possible reason why not is that ambitious women wouldn't be inclined > > to 'stoop so low' to add to the stereotype of utilizing sex or > > sexuality to make a profit. > > > > Who knows? > > > > Interesting question. :D > > > > -- > > Bill C. > > http://TheLab.ReelSolid.TV > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > -- > The Faux Press - better than real > http://fauxpress.blogspot.com > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
