this is very helpful. And I see we have choices because of our history.
But in the apple tv column, something made sence. If you keep your file to one size fits all, it will help your rating's verses, splitting it up with different versions for every different user. So what version whould be truely optimal then, with this in mind? I am thinking qicktime, but i do not want to sway your thoughts, and size? Apple is confusing me on size? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Gena" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok, Let me take a shot at this. You can have any size you want. If > you want to post postage size video that is fine. The following > pertains to vlogs, web video and video on the Internet. > > Back in the day when more folks were on dial-up you had to balance > many factors such as the dimensions, file size, video resolution and > quality. I pulled out one of my old video books and these were the > suggested sizes in the past: > > Delivery/Dimension/Frames Per Second/Audio > E-mail 160x120 10fps Mono 22.05kHz > Web video 240x180 12fps Stereo 22.05 kHz > CD-ROM 320x240 15fps Stereo 44.1kHz > > If you were placing video on a web site circa 1999 the above would > have been fine. But technology has moved forward. > > In 2005 the recommended/suggested/used (pick one)dimension of video on > blogs was 320x240. Video placed on blogs/vlog at 320x240 best meet > those needs of the viewers and content producers. It is still used. > But it isn't the only way to do this. > > It is now 2007. Times have changed. You still have to balance the > factors however more people are on high speed connections. There is > also the introduction of digital camcorders that can record in > different aspect ratios or recording dimensions. > > For example, 640x480 and 320x240 are in the 4:3 aspect ratio or > more square like video. Same shape as an Analog TV screen. > > The newer digital camcorders have the ability to record 16:9 or more > rectangular, like the way it looks like when you view DVD movies on > analog TV sets. Your Apple TV screen is in the 16:9 aspect ratio. > > It is a matter of choice. Your choice on what will best serve the kind > of video you are delivering. > > I'm really simplifying here folks so if the techies want to jump in > feel free. I just want to provide a conceptual understanding. > > Over at Freevlog there are videos that might make it clear to you what > is going on. > > Ryanne has her favorite compression settings > http://www.freevlog.org/index.php/2007/01/14/screencast-ryannes-favorite- compression-settings/ > > If you just want to output to the iPod format then view > http://www.freevlog.org/index.php/2007/03/19/41-compress-for-the-web-imovie/ > > If you are on Windows check out Michael's example. Even if you are a > Mac person check it out. > http://www.freevlog.org/index.php/2007/03/19/4-compress-for-the-web-windows- movie-maker/ > > Keep asking questions, > > Gena > > http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com > http://pcclibtech.blogspot.com > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Daryl Urig" <daryl@> wrote: > > > > I am confused. Can someone read my setting's below in previous > question osted? > > > > I am told apple tv is: 640 x 480, 30 frames per sec., > > > > and I am also told this: > > > > Yes. The standard resolution for ANY videoblog should be 320x240. > > Anything else and you're really making it rather difficult for those > > of who watch via the PC. > > > > Can someone make this clear for me? Also see question below. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Cook" > <patsvideoblog@> wrote: > > > > > > Hi everyone: > > > > > > On 4/14/07, Daryl Urig <daryl@> wrote: > > > > > > > > With the sound track, a one minute movie 133 megs. > > > > I am using 16 bit color > > > > 44 khz 16 bit sterio. > > > > It is a 640 wide so it can be used with apple tv. > > > > > > > > Is this a little large? > > > > > > Yes. The standard resolution for ANY videoblog should be 320x240. > > > Anything else and you're really making it rather difficult for those > > > of who watch via the PC. > > > > > > Bottom line - Large screen resolution doesn't amount to squat. It's > > > VIDEO QUALITY. If the QUALITY of the video is crappy, then you can > > > make the screen resolution WALLSIZED and it'd still be crappy. > > > > > > Someone correct me if I'm wrong here, but aren't the tutorials still > > > up on MeFeedia? > > > > > > Hope this helps :D > > > > > > > What quality should I use on sound track? > > > > What quality should I use on quicktime movie? > > > > How small should this file size be? > > > > > > > > thanks in advance. > > > > > > > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Haugstrup > Pedersen" <solitude@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Den 14.04.2007 kl. 19:06 skrev caroosky <carter@>: > > > > > > > > > > > intermingled somehow. I think quicktime uses an swf in the > quicktime > > > > > > wrapper when making things clickable in the video. Or something. > > > > > > > > > > No. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen > > > > > <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Pat Cook > > > Denver, Colorado > > > WEBSITES - AS MY WACKED OUT WORLD TURNS - > http://pchamster.livejournal.com/ > > > PAT'S REAL DEAL VIDEO BLOG - http://patsrealdeal.livejournal.com/ > > > Pat's Health & Medical Wonders VideoCast - > > > http://patshealthmedicalwondersvideocast.blogspot.com/ > > > MY LIVE CAM - http://patscam.camstreams.com/ > > > YouTube Channel - http://www.youtube.com/amwowttv/ > > > THE PAT COOK SHOW - http://www.livevideo.com/thepatcookshow > > > > > >
