Heh Ive been on the end of such arguments before, my opinions apparently deemed less worthy of consideration because, shock horror, I didnt vlog regularily. And when I did vlog for vlogweek there was no way I was gonna talk about it here much, lest I be told that it was just a bad attempt to join some magic club of 'do-ers', no longer relegated to the lower caste status of non-do'er theoretical waffler.
Ahh most of the responses to this wikipedia issue here make me sick. Cheap insults and heated emotions, egos trampled by being edited. Very little recognition that wikipedia isnt just some wiki, but an encyclopedia. Throw around definitions of wikinazi all you like, what about vlognazi's, people who judge others based on their vlog or lack thereof? What am I going to be told next, that I cant comment on internet video srvices unless Ive set one up myself? Long Live wikipedia! Death to elites! Down with any strategy that aims to diminish the opinions of others based on who they are and what they do, rather than the merit of what they are saying. Cheers (not) Steve Elbows --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Enric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen" > <solitude@> wrote: > > > > Den 02.05.2007 kl. 16:38 skrev Heath <heathparks@>: > > > > > Is there anyone besides me, that thinks this whole conversation is > > > just "whacked"? I mean basicly we are trying to appease a person who > > > no longer even VLOGS!!!!! Does this seem weird to anyone? I > > > understand trying to work with someone, trying to teach, but this > > > just seems crazy......maybe it's just me.... > > > > Videoblogging is not a prerequisite for talking, caring and having > > knowledge about videoblogging. > > > > Mathematics is not a prerequisite for formulating, understanding or > knowledge about physics? > > -- Enric > > > -- > > Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen > > <URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ > > > >
