Andrew,

thanks again.

I had selected "rich media files", but have now selected only "video files", 
does I tunes work 
for you now?

I am not sure about what you ment by:

"I suppose you are doing that through your blogspot blog.", I am not sure I am.

Daryl





--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andrew Darlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Daryl:
> 
> I subscribed to your feed with iTunes and no movie was in the feed. I  
> would defer to some of the other folks on this list about why that  
> is. My guess is that it may be the format of your movie, or you may  
> need to enable "SmartCast" in Feedburner's Optimize Control Panel and  
> choose "only video files" or "any rich media file" so that it  
> generates an enclosure when you post a new blog post. I suppose you  
> are doing that through your blogspot blog.
> 
> There are low cost video flash players at <http:// 
> www.wimpyplayer.com> and there are some freeware/open source options  
> as well. You can check the archives of this list for some links.
> 
> There are many options out there for video sharing. One option for  
> hosting is YouTube if you don't want to worry about bandwidth. There  
> is also blip.tv. I would also ask some of the folks here about other  
> options–I'm learning as well.
> 
> All the best,
> 
> Andrew
> 
> -----------------------------------------
> Andrew Darlow
> Editor, The Imaging Buffet
> http://www.imagingbuffet.com
> http://www.andrewdarlow.com
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> On Jun 28, 2007, at 10:29 PM, Daryl Urig wrote:
> 
> > Andrew, those are all goood comments, I appreciate them all.
> >
> > I hope to impliment many of them. Does the bloging and rss feed  
> > look correct? I want to
> > make sure I am not missing anything technical.
> >
> > What kind of flash player would you use? What would yu use on a non  
> > streaming server?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Daryl
> >
> > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andrew Darlow <ad@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Daryl:
> > >
> > > I just watched your video and looked at your work. First, I really
> > > like your paintings-especially the color work. I didn't know why you
> > > were painted grey until I looked at your work after watching the  
> > video.
> > >
> > > The self-interview, in my opinion, is very entertaining, but also a
> > > little off-putting. Some people might think you are being a bit too
> > > silly for a painter, but others might like the fact that you are
> > > letting your guard down and not being a "stuffy artist." I'm a
> > > photographer and have seen many different sites with galleries. I
> > > like how you present your work, though I would choose a background
> > > color other than white. I think your keepsake portraits are a great
> > > idea, and the video definitely gives people a more personal look at
> > > you–which might entice them to "open their drawers" for you as well
> > > (inside joke for those who have seen the video).
> > >
> > > You might consider turning the camera toward a family member who is
> > > watching you and laughing (to just make light of the whole  
> > thing), or
> > > you can do outtakes showing you getting "made up." I would also
> > > recommend showing the work that you describe (such as the portraits,
> > > giclee prints, on the road series) on the screen in a small window,
> > > or even filling the whole window for a few seconds when you mention
> > > them. I would even include one of your poems (possibly scrolling up
> > > the screen), especially if you plan to incorporate those into  
> > your work.
> > >
> > > I personally don't like the video in a box with the darkened  
> > area. It
> > > feels like my computer is being taken over. I would also use a flash
> > > player and have a way for people to comment and share the video
> > > through an embed URL link. It's all about gettin' viral. There are a
> > > number of free or inexpensive flash players, or you could use a
> > > network or video sharing site, but make sure you read the fine  
> > print.
> > > I think you have it just available in Quicktime, which will limit  
> > the
> > > number of non-Mac users who can view it without downloading a  
> > plug-in.
> > >
> > > I would also try to keep it under 3 minutes. I'm sure others here
> > > will have other suggestions on time.
> > >
> > > I'd also invite people to take a look at your site on other groups
> > > like this one. I moderate one for digital artists (mostly people who
> > > make inkjet prints and other prints for sale and/or exhibition).  
> > Just
> > > search for Digital-fineart on groups.yahoo.com.
> > >
> > > Hope that helps. Best of luck, and congratulations on your paint
> > > palette invention. That is impressive!
> > >
> > > Andrew Darlow
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------
> > > Andrew Darlow
> > > Editor, The Imaging Buffet
> > > http://www.imagingbuffet.com
> > > Chief Cook: http://www.bigdiner.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jun 28, 2007, at 7:19 PM, Daryl Urig wrote:
> > >
> > > > can I get a crit, not getting as much traffic as hoped.
> > > > Am I doing everything correctly?
> > > >
> > > > See video
> > > > Blog and
> > > > RSS Feed
> > > >
> > > > Please try a post to blog, "0" so far?
> > > >
> > > > Here:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.darylurig.com/daryl-urig-video-blog.html
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Daryl
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
> > 
> > Messages in this topic (0)Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic
> > Messages | Links | Polls
> >
> > Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
> > Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch  
> > format to Traditional
> > Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
> >
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


Reply via email to