This discussion is primarily about whether or not TV networks are trying to crush bloggers.
and like I said, net neutrality isn't a simple issue. With a saturated market, ISPs have less reason to invest in new technologies. Additionally, it would be difficult to fight against spam and hacker attacks within the confines of net neutrality. Just an argument to say that there are dangers on both sides of the issue. Let's stick to the topic at hand. On Dec 31, 2007 12:45 PM, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Delongchamp" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Nor is there reason to believe that the internet as we know it would > > slow down. It would likely only speed up for certain services that > > pay more. blip.tv and especially youtube would probably become > > faster, not slower. > > Some of us don't want to hang our hopes on "likely" and "probably" > when our access to information and freedom to disseminate it hang in > the balance. > > Chris > >
