posting it here on Vortex for purposes of using it elsewhere...

Finally! Independent Testing Of Rossi's E-Cat Cold Fusion Device: Maybe The
World Will Change After All
31 comments, 0 called-out
<http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2013/05/20/finally-independent-testing-of-rossis-e-cat-cold-fusion-device-maybe-the-world-will-change-after-all/#comments_header>
Comment 
Now<http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2013/05/20/finally-independent-testing-of-rossis-e-cat-cold-fusion-device-maybe-the-world-will-change-after-all/#comment_reply>
Follow CommentsFollowing CommentsUnfollow Comments <javascript://follow>
Comment 
Now<http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2013/05/20/finally-independent-testing-of-rossis-e-cat-cold-fusion-device-maybe-the-world-will-change-after-all/#comment_reply>
Follow CommentsFollowing CommentsUnfollow Comments <javascript://follow>

[image: Italiano: Schema della cella di
Piantelli-Foca...]<http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Piantelli_Focardi_schema_reattore_01_it.jpg>

Back in October 2011 I first
wrote<http://www.networkworld.com/columnists/2011/101411-backspin-251983.html>about
Italian engineer, Andrea Rossi, and his E-Cat project, a device that
produces heat through a process called a Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR).

Very briefly, LENR, otherwise called cold fusion, is a technique that
generates energy through low temperature (far lower than hot fusion
temperatures which are in the range of tens off thousands of degrees)
reactions that are not chemical. Most importantly, LENR is, theoretically,
much safer, much simpler, and many orders of magnitude cheaper than hot
fusion. Rather than explaining LENR in detail here please see my original
posting<http://www.networkworld.com/columnists/2011/101411-backspin-251983.html>for
a more complete explanation.

My next 
post<http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2011/10/17/hello-cheap-energy-hello-brave-new-world/>on
this topic was here on Forbes a few days later and, as the
labyrinthine
and occasionally ridiculous saga developed, I tried to sort fact from
fiction in a series of posts (see the list at the end of this posting)
which covered everything from unconvincing demos, through an Australian
businessman offering Rossi $1 million to show independently tested proof,
to other players in the LENR market showing interesting results.

I haven’t posted about Rossi and his E-Cat since last August simply because
there wasn’t much to report other than more of Rossi’s unsupported and
infuriating claims that included building large-scale automated factories
to churn out millions of E-Cats (the factories still have no sign of
actually existing) through to unsubstantiated performance claims that
sounded far too good to be true.

What everyone wanted was something that Rossi has been promising was about
to happen for months: An independent test by third parties who were
credible. This report was delayed several times to the point where many
were wondering whether it was all nothing more than what we have come to
see as Rossi’s usual “jam tomorrow” promises. But much to my, and I suspect
many other people’s surprise, a report by credible, independent third
parties is exactly what we got.

Published on May 16, the paper titled “Indication of anomalous heat energy
production in a reactor device <http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3913>” would
appear to deliver what we wanted.

The paper was authored by Giuseppe
Levi<http://www.unibo.it/Faculty/default.htm?TabControl1=TabRicerca&UPN=giuseppe.levi%40unibo.it>of
Bologna University, Bologna, Italy; Evelyn
Foschi <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/evelyn-foschi/5/7b8/645>, Bologna,
Italy; Torbjörn
Hartman<http://katalog.uu.se/simpleinfo/?languageId=1&id=N96-5170>,
Bo Höistad <http://katalog.uu.se/empInfo/?languageId=1&id=XX1060>, Roland
Pettersson <http://katalog.uu.se/empInfo/?id=XX1360> and Lars Tegnér
<http://katalog.uu.se/empInfo/?languageId=1&id=N9-1431>of Uppsala
University, Uppsala, Sweden; and Hanno
Essén<http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hanno_Essen/>,
of the Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. While some of
these people have previously been public in their support of Rossi and the
E-Cat they are all serious academics with reputations to loose and the
paper is detailed and thorough.

The actual test reactor, called the E-Cat HT, was described by the testers
as:

… a high temperature development of the original apparatus which has also
undergone many construction changes in the last two years – is the latest
product manufactured by Leonardo Corporation: it is a device allegedly
capable of producing heat from some type of reaction the origin of which is
unknown.

They described the E-Cat HT as:

… a cylinder having a silicon nitride ceramic outer shell, 33 cm in length,
and 10 cm in diameter. A second cylinder made of a different ceramic
material (corundum) was located within the shell, and housed three
delta-connected spiral-wire resistor coils. Resistors were laid out
horizontally, parallel to and equidistant from the cylinder axis, and were
as long as the cylinder itself. They were fed by a TRIAC power regulator
device which interrupted each phase periodically, in order to modulate
power input with an industrial trade secret waveform. This procedure,
needed to properly activate the E-Cat HT charge, had no bearing whatsoever
on the power consumption of the device, which remained constant throughout
the test. The most important element of the E-Cat HT was lodged inside the
structure. It consisted of an AISI 310 steel cylinder, 3 mm thick and 33 mm
in diameter, housing the powder charges. Two AISI 316 steel cone-shaped
caps were hot-hammered in the cylinder, sealing it hermetically.

Here’s a picture of the E-Cat HT during one of the tests:

<http://b-i.forbesimg.com/markgibbs/files/2013/05/Screen-Shot-2013-05-20-at-6.16.20-PM.png>

There were two test runs of the E-Cat HT (the emphasis is mine):

The present report describes the results obtained from evaluations of the
operation of the E-Cat HT in two test runs. *The first test experiment,
lasting 96 hours* (from Dec. 13th 2012, to Dec. 17th 2012), was carried out
by the two first authors of this paper, Levi and Foschi, while *the second
experiment, lasting for 116 hours* (from March 18th 2013, to March 23rd
2013), was carried out by all authors.

The authors also note various assumptions they made about the test and that
they weren’t in control of all of the aspects of the process but they
apparently didn’t consider any of these to be egregious enough to be
showstoppers.

And now, the big reveal … the authors’ conclusions are (again, the emphasis
is mine):

*… if we consider the whole volume of the reactor core and the most
conservative figures on energy production, we still get a value of (7.93 ±
0.8) 102 MJ/Liter that is one order of magnitude higher than any
conventional source.*

To put that in perspective, the following graph plots the peak power of
various energy sources against their specific energy (energy per unit
mass). As you can see, gasoline is way out in front in terms of how much
energy is available and how much power can be delivered but if this paper
is correct, you can make that “gasoline was way out in front” because, as
can be seen, the E-Cat has roughly four orders of magnitude more specific
energy and three orders of magnitude greater peak power than gasoline!

<http://b-i.forbesimg.com/markgibbs/files/2013/05/130520_ragone_02.png>

*Graph courtesy of Alan Fletcher*

While a few commentators have raised criticisms concerning how the
measurements were made and sources of error others have argued that the
energy produced is so significant even knocking off an order of magnitude
on either axis still portrays a process with insanely valuable output.

This is not, of course, the last word or even one anywhere near the end of
this story but unless this is one of the most elaborate hoaxes in
scientific history it looks like the world may well be about to change. How
quick will depend solely on Rossi.


On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Alan Fletcher <a...@well.com> wrote:

> Mark Gibbs has an article up :
>
>
> http://www.forbes.com/sites/markgibbs/2013/05/20/finally-independent-testing-of-rossis-e-cat-cold-fusion-device-maybe-the-world-will-change-after-all/
>
> (Shout-out and plot to ... guess who? )
>
>

Reply via email to