On Saturday 2018-07-14 21:37 +0200, Mathias Rangel Wulff wrote: > Hi Domenic > > Thank you for getting back to me. > > > Without implementer interest, there's not much we can do on the spec > side. > > Is it correctly understood that with "implementers" you refer to the team > behind each browser implementation? Firefox whitelisted "ipfs" as a safe > scheme in January 2018: > https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/c2cb8a06bcf1
I believe this is a different whitelist, related to Web Extensions. I think the actual list Firefox uses for registerProtocolHandler is based on the following set of preferences: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/search?q=network.protocol-handler.external&path= by the implementation which I believe lives here: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/components/feeds/WebContentConverter.js -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)