Hi Igor, Jonathan,
Good idea, I have never liked the way I had to inherit from the
application base classes.
From a users point of view, I agree with Jonathan on the config thing,
I'd rather have one line of code somewhere (on a predictable place, e.g.
application#init). This also makes it immediately clear when it does not
work: you get a classnotfoundexception. When it is implicit you can
search for hours before you realize that a jar is missing. Especially
when you are talking about annotations.
Regards,
Erik.
Jonathan Locke wrote:
I like the idea of snap-in modules of some sort, but I don't completely
understand what you're talking about here and I'm not sure I agree with what
all of what I do get.....
--
Erik van Oosten
http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
