Dear Guillaume, On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 3:23 PM Guillaume Lederrey <gleder...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Some very preliminary analysis indicates that less then 2% of the queries > on WDQS generate more than 90% of the load. This is definitely something we > need to better understand. > Is the data behind that available? I wonder if I recognize any of the top 25 queries. (I guess the top 2% can be simple queries run very many times, as well as hard queries rarely run, correct?) Egon -- Hi, do you like citation networks? Already 51% of all citations are available <https://i4oc.org/> available for innovative new uses <https://twitter.com/hashtag/acs2ioc>. Join me in asking the American Chemical Society to join the Initiative for Open Citations too <https://www.change.org/p/asking-the-american-chemical-society-to-join-the-initiative-for-open-citations>. SpringerNature, the RSC and many others already did <https://i4oc.org/#publishers>. ----- E.L. Willighagen Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT Maastricht University (http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/) Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/ Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ PubList: https://www.zotero.org/egonw ORCID: 0000-0001-7542-0286 <http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7542-0286> ImpactStory: https://impactstory.org/u/egonwillighagen
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
