This is a mistaken understanding of what "unbalanced" means with respect to Wikipedia.
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Fred Bauder <fredb...@fairpoint.net>wrote: > >> Again - I am not Cirt, and I find the article reasonably balanced. > > > > Having an article that associates someone with human waste be "reasonably > > balanced" is like claiming that an article about the Richard Gere gerbil > > rumor (as long as it stated the rumor was false) would be reasonably > > balanced. > > The association of a living person with shit is inherently unbalanced; > > it spreads a negative POV towards that person, no matter how many > > disclaimers > > we add saying that we don't think he's really like shit. > > Well said. That's the problem. > > Fred > > > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
