(Who’s Kevin?) For Rolling Active Editor, I decided to chunk it into month-long periods. So I am trying the first one for 30 days prior to June 1, 2014. Yet that report nonetheless failed.
The report for newly registered worked out just fine. — James Hare President, Wikimedia DC http://wikimediadc.org @wikimediadc On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Edward Galvez wrote: > > Hi James and Kevin, > > Here are the global metrics specifications for newly registered and active > editors involved for wmf grantees. James, please let us know if you are > looking for other metrics or if these are what you need. I ask because the > metrics you are specifying sound different. > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Learning_patterns/Number_of_newly_registered_users > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Learning_patterns/Number_of_active_editors_involved > > Thanks! > Edward > > > > On Mar 19, 2015, at 9:42 AM, James Hare <james.h...@wikidc.org > (mailto:james.h...@wikidc.org)> wrote: > > > Rolling new active editor may not be the metric I need. Just, for that > > period of time, I need to know which of the editors were active editors (5+ > > edits/month) and which had created their accounts in that period. > > > > > > Thanks, > > James > > > > — > > James Hare > > President, Wikimedia DC > > http://wikimediadc.org > > @wikimediadc > > > > > > On Thursday, March 19, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Dan Andreescu wrote: > > > > > James, > > > > > > I'm cc-ing Jonathan as this issue looks to have two components. > > > > > > First, James, I ran the Edits metric on your cohort and it worked ok. I > > > am running the Rolling New Active Editor metric and it seems a bit slow, > > > so we're looking into that. > > > > > > Second, how exactly are these reports run? Like, are you using Rolling > > > New Active Editor and doing it in chunks of 30 days over the period you > > > need? Could you detail this, as these rolling metrics are very slow and > > > were not really meant for this kind of use. We can adjust our system > > > accordingly (maybe we can make faster metrics that get to what you need > > > better). > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:04 PM, James Hare <james.h...@wikidc.org > > > (mailto:james.h...@wikidc.org)> wrote: > > > > I want to know, for a period from July 1 to September 30, which of the > > > > ~1,300 contributors are new, and which are active editors, per the > > > > global metrics meanings of those terms. Let me know fi you need a list > > > > of usernames from me. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > James > > > > > > > > — > > > > James Hare > > > > President, Wikimedia DC > > > > http://wikimediadc.org > > > > @wikimediadc > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Nuria Ruiz wrote: > > > > > > > > > James, > > > > > > > > > > There are probably better metrics for your purposes, could you let us > > > > > know what data are you interested on? Once we know that we can take a > > > > > look to see if there are any issues with the tool itself. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Nuria > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:47 PM, James Hare <james.h...@wikidc.org > > > > > (mailto:james.h...@wikidc.org)> wrote: > > > > > > I am trying to run a report measuring rolling active editor and > > > > > > newly registered for a cohort of about ~20,000 accounts (actually > > > > > > only about ~1,300 Commons usernames, but I opted to have it > > > > > > extended to their global accounts in case they also did stuff > > > > > > outside of Commons). I have now tried to run the report twice and > > > > > > it has failed. Anyone know what is going on? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > James > > > > > > > > > > > > — > > > > > > James Hare > > > > > > President, Wikimedia DC > > > > > > http://wikimediadc.org > > > > > > @wikimediadc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > Wikimetrics mailing list > > > > > > Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org > > > > > > (mailto:Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org) > > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Wikimetrics mailing list > > > > > Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org > > > > > (mailto:Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org) > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Wikimetrics mailing list > > > > Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org (mailto:Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org) > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Wikimetrics mailing list > > > Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org (mailto:Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org) > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimetrics mailing list > > Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org (mailto:Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org) > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics > _______________________________________________ > Wikimetrics mailing list > Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org (mailto:Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org) > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics > >
_______________________________________________ Wikimetrics mailing list Wikimetrics@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimetrics
