Your claims that the abusive destruction of copyleft by the Wikidata project have nothing to do with copyright and nothing to do with Wikidata don't make any sense.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:00 AM, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com > wrote: > Hoi, > That is one argument that has nothing to do with copyright. Google may use > our content as long as it complies with the license. In addition to this, > our aim is to share in the sum of all knowledge. Arguably when Google pays > for the distribution, it saves us money.. Your logic has us pay Google for > helping us achieve our aims. > > In addition, this has nothing to do with Wikidata. > Thanks, > GerardM > > On 18 June 2018 at 15:18, The Cunctator <cuncta...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > It looks from that discussion that the violations of cc-by-sa in order to > > help google's profits have not been in any way resolved. > > > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018, 1:56 AM Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemow...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Ave Cunctator. > > > > > > The Cunctator, 18/06/2018 04:46: > > > > If it's pulling from Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA) > > > > > > It's not, in the sense that it's not getting any copyrightable bits > from > > > it. > > > > > > A relevant document is > > > <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikilegal/Database_Rights>. > > > > > > Then just few days ago there was an exhausting discussion in various > > > mailing lists and <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T193728>. > > > > > > Federico > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikipedia-l mailing list > > Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikipedia-l mailing list > Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l > _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
