On 18 March 2018 at 10:56, Isarra Yos <zhoris...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There are also some problems that need addressing down the road: that I'm > not sure how safe it is for caching and the like to just go moving > images/css files around willy-nilly, that there are no 'standard' skin > practices as far as anyone can tell, and that some people seem to think > MonoBook is bad and not worth this. But MonoBook is not bad. It is a > delightful skin. We should preserve it, and not just in formaldehyde.
Just make it MonoBookV5? *runs*, or more realistically V2 then progressively get rid of the orginal MonoBook? _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
