On 12/1/23 20:27, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
> diff --git a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c b/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
> index 43216429d9..7c84cee5d1 100644
> --- a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
> @@ -598,6 +675,18 @@ static void cf_check rom_write(
>          rom->addr = val & PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK;
>  }
>  
> +static int bar_add_rangeset(const struct pci_dev *pdev, struct vpci_bar *bar,
> +                            unsigned int i)
> +{
> +    char str[32];
> +
> +    snprintf(str, sizeof(str), "%pp:BAR%u", &pdev->sbdf, i);
> +
> +    bar->mem = rangeset_new(pdev->domain, str, RANGESETF_no_print);
> +
> +    return !bar->mem ? -ENOMEM : 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int cf_check init_bars(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  {
>      uint16_t cmd;
> @@ -679,6 +768,10 @@ static int cf_check init_bars(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>          else
>              bars[i].type = VPCI_BAR_MEM32;
>  
> +        rc = bar_add_rangeset(pdev, &bars[i], i);
> +        if ( rc )
> +            goto fail;
> +
>          rc = pci_size_mem_bar(pdev->sbdf, reg, &addr, &size,
>                                (i == num_bars - 1) ? PCI_BAR_LAST : 0);
>          if ( rc < 0 )
> @@ -728,6 +821,12 @@ static int cf_check init_bars(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>                                     rom_reg, 4, rom);
>              if ( rc )
>                  rom->type = VPCI_BAR_EMPTY;
> +            else
> +            {
> +                rc = bar_add_rangeset(pdev, rom, i);

Although purely cosmetic, it looks like this should use num_bars, not i.

> +                if ( rc )
> +                    goto fail;
> +            }
>          }
>      }
>      else

Reply via email to