On 30/01/2024 3:02 pm, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 01:55:56PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 30.01.2024 12:46, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 11:42:43AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 30.01.2024 11:27, Roger Pau Monne wrote: >>>>> Dummy set/clear tests for additional spec_ctrl bits. >>>>> --- >>>>> docs/all-tests.dox | 2 + >>>>> tests/test/Makefile | 9 ++++ >>>>> tests/test/main.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> 3 files changed, 111 insertions(+) >>>>> create mode 100644 tests/test/Makefile >>>>> create mode 100644 tests/test/main.c >>>> I'm puzzled: Why "test"? That doesn't describe in any way what this test >>>> is about. >>> That's just my place holder for random XTF stuff. I don't intend this >>> to be committed. >> Could have been said then one way or another. > Yes, realized later when speaking with Andrew that I had forgot to send > the test I've used, and then didn't adjust the message when sending to > note this wasn't supposed to be applied.
I've got a local test with some of this in, which I'll extend. But as with many other things, it's waiting on fixing the test-revision build infrastructure so the OSSTest Bisector doesn't break when adding new content to an existing test. ~Andrew
