On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 15:05 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.02.2024 13:49, Oleksii wrote:
> > On Mon, 2024-02-05 at 08:46 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > On 02.02.2024 18:30, Oleksii wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2024-01-23 at 14:03 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > > On 22.12.2023 16:13, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> > > > > > +/* Convert between Xen-heap virtual addresses and page-
> > > > > > info
> > > > > > structures. */
> > > > > > +static inline struct page_info *virt_to_page(const void
> > > > > > *v)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + BUG();
> > > > > > + return NULL;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +/*
> > > > > > + * We define non-underscored wrappers for above conversion
> > > > > > functions.
> > > > > > + * These are overriden in various source files while
> > > > > > underscored
> > > > > > version
> > > > > > + * remain intact.
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > +#define virt_to_mfn(va) __virt_to_mfn(va)
> > > > > > +#define mfn_to_virt(mfn) __mfn_to_virt(mfn)
> > > > >
> > > > > Is this really still needed? Would be pretty nice if in a new
> > > > > port we
> > > > > could get to start cleanly right away (i.e. by not needing
> > > > > per-
> > > > > file
> > > > > overrides, but using type-safe expansions here right away).
> > > > We still need __virt_to_mfn and __mfn_to_virt as common code
> > > > use
> > > > them:
> > > > * xen/common/xenoprof.c:24:#define virt_to_mfn(va)
> > > > mfn(__virt_to_mfn(va))
> > >
> > > Are you meaning to enable this code on RISC-V.
> > Yes, that is what I meant.
>
> And why would you do that? Even Arm doesn't use it, and I'd expect no
> newer port would care about this very old interface.
Oh, sorry, I read your question wrongly. I am not going to enable that
config.
~ Oleksii
