On 24.04.2024 05:34, Henry Wang wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This is the remaining series for the full functional "dynamic node
> programming using overlay dtbo" feature. The first part [1] has
> already been merged.
> 
> Quoting from the original series, the first part has already made
> Xen aware of new device tree node which means updating the dt_host
> with overlay node information, and in this series, the goal is to
> map IRQ and IOMMU during runtime, where we will do the actual IOMMU
> and IRQ mapping to a running domain and will call unmap_mmio_regions()
> to remove the mapping.
> 
> Also, documentation of the "dynamic node programming using overlay dtbo"
> feature is added.
> 
> Patch 1 is a fix of [1] which is noticed during my local test, details
> please see the commit message.
> 
> Gitlab CI for this series can be found in [2].
> 
> [1] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/20230906011631.30310-1-vikram.garh...@amd.com/
> [2] https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/henryw/xen/-/pipelines/1265297506
> 
> Henry Wang (1):
>   xen/commom/dt-overlay: Fix missing lock when remove the device
> 
> Vikram Garhwal (14):
>   xen/arm/gic: Enable interrupt assignment to running VM
>   xen/arm: Always enable IOMMU
>   tools/libs/light: Always enable IOMMU
>   tools/libs/light: Increase nr_spi to 160
>   rangeset: Move struct range and struct rangeset to headerfile
>   xen/overlay: Enable device tree overlay assignment to running domains
>   tools: Add domain_id and expert mode for overlay operations
>   tools/libs/light: Modify dtbo to domU linux dtbo format
>   tools/xl: Share overlay with domU
>   tools/helpers: Add get_overlay
>   get_overlay: remove domU overlay
>   xl/overlay: add remove operation to xenstore
>   add a domU script to fetch overlays and applying them to linux
>   docs: add device tree overlay documentation

For all the replies I sent, Vikram's addresses - Xilinx or AMD - bounced.
What's the value of Cc-ing dead addresses?

Jan

Reply via email to