On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 9:38 PM Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: > Both fields can reasonably share uint32_t, but could you work with Petr > to make both halfs of this land cleanly.
Hi, I think creating a new anonymous struct "altp2m" within `struct domain` would be a good fit. uint16_t for my MAX_ALTP2M replacement field will be enough, so the other uint16_t could be used for various altp2m modes/flags. P.
