On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Soeren Sandmann<sandm...@daimi.au.dk> wrote: > Maarten Maathuis <madman2...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Does this make transformed composite (XRGB source) with no extending >> ok again with regards to the black pixels that a lot of hw sample >> outside the texture? > > It doesn't change that. > >> Previously it switched from being ok to being bad, i'm just curious if >> it changed again? > > The RENDER spec says that for REPEAT_NONE, pixels outside the texture > are 0, which is what pixman has always done for transformed images and > in 0.16.0 will also do in the non-transformed case. Previously it > would clip those pixels away and not do any compositing for them. > > For operators like SRC, this is the difference between leaving the > destination in place and painting it transparent black.
I'm still curious how a texture without alpha channel is supposed to have transparent pixels. > > > Soren > _______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list xorg-devel@lists.x.org http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
