On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Peter Hutterer <peter.hutte...@who-t.net> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 09:34:38AM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote: >> On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:19:52 -0500 >> Tom Horsley wrote: >> >> > That might be the very thing! There is even a fedora package >> > for it. I'm off to crank it up and see if I can get it >> > to work they way I want. Thanks! >> >> Unfortunately, just like gnome-mouse-properties, there is >> nothing in this tool that will handle the button mapping or >> drag lock changes I want :-(. > > As with much of input, we've been in a transitional phase for the last years > to turn from the old static system into a more flexible and dynamic one. X > is on the bottom of the stack, so any change needs to be reflected in the > upper layers - and they're not necessarily there yet. > > We're slowly catching up, but not as quick as some would like us and many > options are still not exposed - drag lock being one example. > > So here's the cardhouse: > As you said, the single xorg.conf file isn't really suited to evdev (or the > other way round). The input system is now aimed at per-device, per-session > (runtime) configuration. Static configuration is possible, but discouraged. > You can dop keys into the HAL configuration, but that'll go away eventually > with udev. > The best proposal for static configuration were Dan's xorg.conf.d patches > but I don't know how much they have progressed in the last months. Maybe Dan > can comment on that?
Just finished it yesterday (been too busy), and it seems to work correctly. I'll post it shortly. -- Dan _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg