On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 01:45:15AM +0000, Matt Turner wrote: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Frans de Boer <fr...@fransdb.nl> wrote: > > Thanks Adam, > > > > Because of my unfamiliarity with the people involved with xorg, can anybody > > verify the claim Adam made? > > I can't verify it. But I had a pretty strong suspicion. :) > > > If it was just a misplaced competition effort, I can continue to rely on the > > xorg code. > > It was a prank. I'm sure he didn't foresee people getting this anxious over > it. > > > Also, if it turns out to be a validated claim Adam made, accept it as is and > > continue. Hopefully Adam has learned his lesson. But also Freedesktop.org > > should have it's act together. Do check the access rights and allow only > > trusted persons root access. Hopefully Adam was NOT one of them they trusted > > explicitly and he has only access due to historical reasons. > > Adam was trusted, and is still trusted I'd say. Because it was a joke. > He made a funny commit in a branch of a dead project that no one has > even committed build fixes to since May. No one, especially Adam, is > going to insert backdoors in the xserver or whatever it is you're > thinking. The guy has 28 commits to the xserver alone since 1.9 was > released on August 20. > > Matt
This here is not a joke at all. Stop downplaying it. Luc Verhaegen. _______________________________________________ xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg Your subscription address: arch...@mail-archive.com
