On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Luc Verhaegen <l...@skynet.be> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 04:36:17PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Luc Verhaegen <l...@skynet.be> wrote: >> > >> > See, this was exactly the problem here. It _was_ a freedesktop admin. >> > And it was pretty clear that it was that from the onset too. Mailing >> > fd.o admins, even if i could've dug up an email address in the split >> > second that i wrote the email (heck, i even mistyped repository), was >> > not the right course of action. >> >> So you mailed 2 mailing lists consisting of 2-300 people who could do >> nothing about it? >> >> nice work. >> >> Dave. > > Heh. > > I already wasted quite some time on the actions of one of your > colleagues, i guess i can waste some more time on yours. > > Stop the counter-attack dave, it's far too obvious what you are doing > here.
Paranoid much? still seeing faces in the dark? Like really if you can't answer a simple question about why you mailed 200 people who couldn't do any investigation of the issue without going off the deep end I have to wonder. Dave. > > The means to the end were perfectly justifiable under the circumstances, > and this includes the years of experience i have with dealing with X.org > community. This especially includes the experience of something as noble > as the radeonhd driver project. > > Anything else than a similar course action would've meant that the issue > would've been silenced to death. > > Luc Verhaegen. > _______________________________________________ xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg Your subscription address: arch...@mail-archive.com