Hello Steve, On 12/8/23 23:39, Steve Sakoman wrote: > Mickledore is already end-of-life, so no further builds are scheduled.
Ah, yes, I checked that before sending because I had a doubt about whether this series would still be useful on top of mickledore, but since the 4.2.4.rc3 is still in progress, I was not sure. So ok, feel free to drop this series. > There is a dunfell release that I plan to build this weekend, so a > patchset for dunfell would be much appreciated if you would like me to > test it with the 3.1.30 build. > > And a kirkstone release is due shortly thereafter, so we also need it there > too! I am not sure that a backport is really needed on dunfell and kirkstone, because - "dunfell" is properly described in BUILD_HISTORY_DIRECTPUSH in config.json, on dunfell branch - "kirkstone" is properly described in BUILD_HISTORY_DIRECTPUSH in config.json, on kirkstone branch (so yes, the issue was really affecting mickledore specifically) Anyway, the wider issue is that those branches are lacking almost all developments I did since ~January on send-qa-email, so some things may work (test results storage), some other may not (regression reports based on those results). It is also true for poky. A whole backport is of course possible, but that would definitely need some thorough testing before using it for releases. Kind regards, Alexis -- Alexis Lothoré, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#61851): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/61851 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/103064175/21656 Group Owner: yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
