> Suggestion: `zeekcl`, Zeek (Command-Line) CLlient. "zeekcl" is very close to "zeekctl", which could lead to confusion. "zcl" maybe?
> Is use of Python still desirable for other reasons? Otherwise, I lean > towards `zeekcl` being C++. No particular preference from my side, I can see either. Effort is probably about the same in this model, and C++ does have the advantage of less dependency issues. > Zeek's scripting language (e.g. `ctl.zeek`), but I don't suggest that Ack, agree. > I plan to have `zeekcl` code/tests live inside the main Zeek repo. Makes sense to me as well. Robin -- Robin Sommer * Corelight, Inc. * ro...@corelight.com * www.corelight.com _______________________________________________ Zeek-Dev mailing list Zeek-Dev@zeek.org http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/zeek-dev
