The "Kings of Techno" thing they did together at ILT spawned a new phrase... 

"Dad Techno".




-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 October 2006 10:20
To: 313@Hyperreal.Org
Subject: RE: (313) Re: kings of techno


I know this double CD has been posted about before on here and there was a 
debate about what tracks should be on there and whether
Garnier was the best guy to be involved in the compilation of it.
However my question is a different one - it's found it's was to my local shop 
http://www.piccadillyrecords.com/  I think when
someone (Marsel?) originally put up the track list I thought it was one CD from 
Garnier and one from c2.  However in the description
on Piccadilly's site it says:

"The mix CD has Carl and Laurent talking over the tracks in places and is even 
interspersed at times with field recordings and
interviews from key musical innovators and musicians"

so I'm guessing both are involved in both CDs, one's unmixed and the other as 
above - so how is this one with interviews etc if
anyone's heard it?  Sounds like it could be good if done well (or the reverse!).



Keep informed throughout the day with the Telegraph's breaking news, commentary 
and opinion on www.telegraph.co.uk


This e-mail is from Telegraph Group Limited - 1 Canada Square, Canary Wharf, 
London E14 5DT, registered in England under No 451593 ("we", "our" or us"). 
This message, its contents and any attachments to it are private and 
confidential. Any unauthorised disclosure, use or dissemination of the whole or 
part of this message (without our prior written consent) is prohibited. If you 
are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately. Neither we nor 
the sender accepts any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility 
to scan attachments (if any). 

The content of this email does not necessarily reflect our views or those of 
our officers and we take no responsibility for the views of the author.

Emails sent and received may be read by people other than the intended 
recipient and may be monitored to ensure efficient operation of our email 
systems.

Reply via email to