yeah, but how many people know what Mojo even looks like? most photos I've seen his face has been in the shadows
MEK "Frank Glazer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/21/2008 03:06:03 PM: > on second thought, it's not that i'm against pedestals, i think it's > pretty silly to put kraftwerk on an imaginary mount rushmore of > detroit techno. i say put mojo up there, which, in effect, includes > kraftwerk, amongst other influences. in everything i've read on the > subject, kraftwerk has only been listed as one of many influences, > almost always sourced through mojo. heck, i think prince is more > important to detroit techno than kraftwerk is!!! > > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Frank Glazer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > maybe. > > > > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Matt Kane's Brain > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Frank Glazer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> enh. whatever. i am so tired of this argument. i don't see why > >>> everybody is so passionately for putting kraftwerk on such a high > >>> pedestal. they're just one band. > >> > >> It sounds more like you are skeptical of the utility of pedestals, > >> period. After all, we are just people. In that case, why should we > >> care what you think? And why should you care about what any of us > >> thinks? > >> > >> -- > >> matt kane's brain > >> biweekly techno radio at: http://hydrogenproject.com http://wzbc.org > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > peace, > > > > frank > > > > dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com > > > > > > -- > peace, > > frank > > dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com
