Hey I wanted to read about podcast law not netiquette. Could you change
the subject please? > I disagree. I don't have any interest in reading
about podcast laws
> and regulations. The original post was about a specific detroit
> related thing that I wanted to keep track of for later, but now i have
> to read a new email that has nothing to do with the op every time
> somebody replies. A subject change would easily fix this, and it's
> just good netiquette.
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:35 AM, Odeluga, Ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> No big deal really - it's still related to the event, which was in
>> itself pretty unusual, as the post below points out.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Frank Glazer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 12:32 PM
>> To: 313@hyperreal.org
>> Subject: (313) new zealand's podcast laws (was Re: Fw: Re: (313) Mad
>> Mike interview)
>>
>>
>> people on this list need to learn how to change the subject lines
>> accordingly when the original intent of the post is lost.
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:55 AM, pauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> BBC do exactly the same thing for podcasts of previously recorded
>>> radio shows. A podcast is a download, not listened to live, it's not a
>>
>>> performance licence that's required by Radio NZ. UR needs to be able
>>> to collect for the use of their material from the listener, from the
>>> downloader. And as RNZ aren't in the business of selling music, and UR
>>
>>> aren't giving it away, all they can do is make available for downlaod
>>> the material that they own the copyright to, which is the chat, not
>>> the music. I think it's it's amazing he was interviewed at all by the
>>> state broadcaster...I can't see BBC1 giving him 30 minutes during any
>>> given day.
>>>
>>> essentially it's the listener who needs to > This proves once again
>>> how NZ takes America's most trumped-up
>>>> regulations and makes them worse.
>>>>
>>>> I know there are geeks in the house who will enjoy Peter Gutmann's
>>>> classic story about NZ regulation in the 1990s of "digital
>>>> munitions," otherwise known as cryptographic keys, or, "my life as a
>>>> Kiwi arms courier."
>>>>
>>>> http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/policy/courier.html
>>>> http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/policy/wass99.html
>>>>
>>>> fh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------ mail forwarded, original message follows ------
>>>>
>>>> To: 313@hyperreal.org
>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <Andy Mitchell>
>>>> Subject: Re: (313) Mad Mike interview
>>>> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:20:16 +1200 (NZST)
>>>>
>>>>>> They won't let you waiver - music is music to mcps/prs etc and they
>>
>>>>>> do close people down for it.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a New Zealand site remember, so it's controlled by local
>>>>> organisation RIANZ not any American organisation. I'm guessing their
>>
>>>>> fees are equally prohibitive though, because *no-one* offers
>>>>> podcasts or even streaming archived shows here unless they consist
>>>>> purely of talk.
>>>>
>>>> So I did some snooping and the local situation is this (turned out it
>>
>>>> was an organisation called Phonographic Performances New Zealand who
>>>> control broadcast licenses here):
>>>>
>>>>> PPNZ does not have an existing assignment to blanket licence
>>>>> podcasts at the present time. Any broadcaster seeking to make
>>>>> available music on demand is required to seek the permission of the
>>>>> individual copyright owners concerned.
>>>>
>>>> So it's more or less impossible to archive music radio online from
>>>> here!Madness...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> peace,
>>
>> frank
>>
>> dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> peace,
>
> frank
>
> dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com
>
