TOUCHE On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:04 AM, pauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey I wanted to read about podcast law not netiquette. Could you change > the subject please? > I disagree. I don't have any interest in reading > about podcast laws >> and regulations. The original post was about a specific detroit >> related thing that I wanted to keep track of for later, but now i have >> to read a new email that has nothing to do with the op every time >> somebody replies. A subject change would easily fix this, and it's >> just good netiquette. >> >> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:35 AM, Odeluga, Ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> No big deal really - it's still related to the event, which was in >>> itself pretty unusual, as the post below points out. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Frank Glazer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 12:32 PM >>> To: 313@hyperreal.org >>> Subject: (313) new zealand's podcast laws (was Re: Fw: Re: (313) Mad >>> Mike interview) >>> >>> >>> people on this list need to learn how to change the subject lines >>> accordingly when the original intent of the post is lost. >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:55 AM, pauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> BBC do exactly the same thing for podcasts of previously recorded >>>> radio shows. A podcast is a download, not listened to live, it's not a >>> >>>> performance licence that's required by Radio NZ. UR needs to be able >>>> to collect for the use of their material from the listener, from the >>>> downloader. And as RNZ aren't in the business of selling music, and UR >>> >>>> aren't giving it away, all they can do is make available for downlaod >>>> the material that they own the copyright to, which is the chat, not >>>> the music. I think it's it's amazing he was interviewed at all by the >>>> state broadcaster...I can't see BBC1 giving him 30 minutes during any >>>> given day. >>>> >>>> essentially it's the listener who needs to > This proves once again >>>> how NZ takes America's most trumped-up >>>>> regulations and makes them worse. >>>>> >>>>> I know there are geeks in the house who will enjoy Peter Gutmann's >>>>> classic story about NZ regulation in the 1990s of "digital >>>>> munitions," otherwise known as cryptographic keys, or, "my life as a >>>>> Kiwi arms courier." >>>>> >>>>> http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/policy/courier.html >>>>> http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/policy/wass99.html >>>>> >>>>> fh >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------ mail forwarded, original message follows ------ >>>>> >>>>> To: 313@hyperreal.org >>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <Andy Mitchell> >>>>> Subject: Re: (313) Mad Mike interview >>>>> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:20:16 +1200 (NZST) >>>>> >>>>>>> They won't let you waiver - music is music to mcps/prs etc and they >>> >>>>>>> do close people down for it. >>>>>> >>>>>> This is a New Zealand site remember, so it's controlled by local >>>>>> organisation RIANZ not any American organisation. I'm guessing their >>> >>>>>> fees are equally prohibitive though, because *no-one* offers >>>>>> podcasts or even streaming archived shows here unless they consist >>>>>> purely of talk. >>>>> >>>>> So I did some snooping and the local situation is this (turned out it >>> >>>>> was an organisation called Phonographic Performances New Zealand who >>>>> control broadcast licenses here): >>>>> >>>>>> PPNZ does not have an existing assignment to blanket licence >>>>>> podcasts at the present time. Any broadcaster seeking to make >>>>>> available music on demand is required to seek the permission of the >>>>>> individual copyright owners concerned. >>>>> >>>>> So it's more or less impossible to archive music radio online from >>>>> here!Madness... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> peace, >>> >>> frank >>> >>> dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> peace, >> >> frank >> >> dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com >> > > >
-- peace, frank dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com
