On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: > >> /me likes simple, and this revision > > confession: it came out of a discussion in which i participated > > > How about: > > > > "ACME certificate management must provide automated methods for > > revocation parallel to those use to request a certificate"? > > what the heck does "parallel" mean? does it include means to revoke a > cert for which i have lost the private key and want to use an entirely > different proof of ownership/control? >
To me it means if you prove control of a domain in order to request a cert by methods 1, 2, or 3, then you can request revocation if you can prove control by the same set of methods. I do not think it means that you have to pick the same one from the set, but it is something for the working group to discuss. Is there language you like better for that? Ted > > ramdu >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
