> The biggest concern I have is the text regarding certificate lifetime and the > handling of the possibility that IP addresses are dynamically allocated. This > seems a little weak and it leaves a lot to the CA to manage. Is there > anything > that can be done to gain a stronger assertion that the allocation is (more) > persistent? An affirmation from someone higher in the tree perhaps?
That's interesting. Who is "higher" in the tree? IP space isn't hierarchical like DNS is it? _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
