Gert Doering wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 05:16:32PM +0100, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: >> > That???s why I suggested that the limit can be only /64 if we want to have >> > a in PI at the time being. > > A /64 for what? per customer?
... which is why Jordi's approach is a big deal. We either have PI or we don't, but I don't think its demise should be handled by slipping some innocuous looking test into the ipv6 policy spec. Changing the terms of PI is a significant change in the direction of the RIPE community and the RIPE NCC and shouldn't be approached in a piecemeal sort of way. Nick
