On 6/7/07, William Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is also
D. The other members of the consortiums philosophical approaches to
AGI share little in common with your own and the time spent trying to
communicate with the consortium about which class of system to
investigate would be better spent trying to communicate with the world
in general. For example if you are committed to a connectionist
approach but the consortium is mainly logical.
The consortium has no boss and it doesn't discriminate against any AI
paradigm. If you have a connectionist or even an unconventional approach to
AGI, you can simply post your ideas there as a "seed" and see if like-minded
people would comment on or expand it. That'd be an excellent place for
finding AGI partners. As in all Web 2.0 projects, the outcome cannot be
predicted by the founders, nor do I try to domineer over the course of AGI
development within it.
YKY
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&user_secret=e9e40a7e
