On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Sean Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:
> For each of the following proposals, I initiate an Agoran Decision on
> whether to adopt the proposal. If any of the listed proposals are not in
> the Proposal Pool and are authored by myself, I first submit them.
> The valid options for these decisions are FOR, PRESENT, and AGAINST. The
> vote collector for each of these proposals is the Assessor. The adoption
> index for each proposal is given below as well as whether or not it is a
> democratic or ordinary decision. For democratic decisions, the set of
> eligible voters is the set of active first-class players as of this
> message, their voting limits are each one. For ordinary proposals, the
> set of eligible voters is the set of active players as of this message,
> their voting limits are as described in rule 2156. Eligibility and
> voting limits do not change during the election period. An ordinary
> proposal may be made democratic with 2 support; this will change the set
> of eligible voters and their voting limits. All other essential
> parameters for the decisions are listed in the header; prior to the text
> of the proposal.
>
> The following summary is provided for convenience but does not affect
> the validity of the Agoran Decisions:
>
> NUM TITLE T AI II AUTHOR
> 6237 Fix veto D 3.0 1 comex
>
> T is the type; O for ordinary or D for democratic.
>
> }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
> Number: 6237
> Title: Fix veto
> Author: comex
> Adoption Index: 3.0 (Democratic)
> Interest Index: 1
>
> Change the Power of Rule 2019 (Prerogatives) to 3, and amend it by
> replacing:
>
> c) Wielder of Veto. The Wielder of Veto CAN veto an ordinary
> decision in its voting period by announcement; this increases
> its Adoption Index by 1.
>
> with:
>
> c) Wielder of Veto. The Wielder of Veto CAN veto a decision
> with an adoption index in its voting period by announcement.
> The adoption index of a decision that has been vetoed is one
> more than it would otherwise be, rules to the contrary
> notwithstanding.
>
> [Veto is currently broken, because Rule 106 (Power=3), which defines
> the adoption index of a proposal, takes precedence over Rule 2019
> (Power=2); it's also unclear what happens to a decision without an
> adoption index. This fixes these problems and also strengthens veto
> somewhat.]
> }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
>
FOR
